The Best of Proto-Bytes Bits-n-Bytes, A Non-All-Inclusive Scientific Research Information and Idea Exchange


 Today I received a text mesage from a friend telling me they were celibrating thier 23rd anaversary of a special occasion.  So I decided to give a polite reply with some numerical analysis of 23.  I found a connection to the Fabannici Series and the Golden Ratio.  I thought how sweet, 23 = natural beauty for my friend on this special day.

While doing the research on the internet of the numbers I was crunching, I also found the following numerical series someone submitted and the site ask.com replied it was a phone number.  So I did my own analysis of it and here is what I was able to unravel.  My analysis is a little off of what some mathamiticians might seem is real inductive numerical analysis, however, the same method has always given me outstandingly high scores on my IQ tests so there must be something to the method of my maddness.

Any way I posted an entry on Face Book about my little morning exersize, which now has driven me into the after noon because ask deleted my detailed essay on the topic, and others wanted to see it and I send a tweet about it to see if anyone would like to reviwe my methods and have any comment.  Well, it’s taken me another 2 and 1/2 hours of recaculation and going even further to create this blog and do even more detailed research.  Hope you have fun reading the numerical methoda and conclusions I jump to…  They seem to entertain me…

Base Pairs: [5 2] [3 4] [2 3] [4]

[First order base pairs calculation on base pairs]

5-2=3

3-4=1 [1st Group 1: pairs {3,1}]

—–

[Second order base pairs  calculation on base pairs]

1-3=2 [Continue using the Group 1 base pair result]

3-4=1 [1st Group 2: pairs {2,1}]

—–

[Third order base pairs result all base pairs]

2-1=1 [1st Result Group: series terminator {1}]

[now reverse the process and revers the induction to add the First order Reslt Pairs]

3+1=4

2+1=3 [2nd Group: pairs {4,3}]

—–

[Again reverse the induction now subtract]

4-3=1 [2nd Result Group: {1}]

[Finally last subtraction of 1st result and 2nd result group {1,1}]

1-1=0 [Final Result: Absolute terminator {0}]

This is an interesting series.  The first group result yields mankind’s first logical number assignment 1 in the

counting system.  The second result group also yields 1 as the result, perhaps a mathematical logical expression

of trying to identify that if we both have ‘1’ and give it to a third who will have ‘2’ and we are both left with ‘0’

The addition of zero was never really introduced into mankind’s number system until this kind of calculation was necessary

mostly for book keeping, in small trade it was common knowledge that if you give it all away you walk away with nothing

but that is not how the barter system worked, which is what mankind used to assure that trade was fair and there was

never an deficiency of free trade.  So when these type of issues arose someone usually got hit over the head with a

blunt object to settle the dispute, and take what was rightfully theirs.  Okay, that was my analysis on inductive

addition and subtracting to achieve a derived absolute number result.  The same method could derive a formula that

would produce an endless series of number that conform to the it’s all equal to zero in the end, by correctly extending

the series.

The second analysis I performed was to see what the number add to and subtracted to:

23  [additive, which is a prime number (interesting)]

-13 [subtractive, also a prime number (equally interesting)]

in primes there is a great interest in finding what are called trans dental prime numbers, in which

the whole manifold of transcendental sets belonging to the absolute transcendental manifold is nearly infinite,

However it is believed that prime transcendental number belong to a set of number with an exact number of

possible transcenant primes.  So I looked for one:

23/13 = 1.7692307692307692307692307692308 [rational because it has real numbers which are divided]

then the inverse:

13/23 = 0.56521739130434782608695652173913

Correction: I used an on line Hugh number calculator to double check the math…  The number is not irrational at all

Okay nothing seemed too interesting here, so I subtracted:

0.56521739130434782608695652173913 – 1.7692307692307692307692307692308 =

-1.2040133779264214046822742474917 [this is irrational, perhaps a transcendental number also, not going to poof that]

 and the positive if the sine is reversed:

1.2040133779264214046822742474917

Actually my x64 bit computer did not fully caculate the number so I thought it was irrational, however it is not:

1.204013377926421404682274247491638795986622073578595317725752508361204013377926421404682274247491

Well no search engine comes up with any answers on the above number,

however The Wolframalpha DB has some really close approximations for this number.

The best are:

[This is the exact ratio for the huge number calculation above]

360/299

and the linear continued fraction in form {1, 4, 1, 9, 6} “suppose this yields an exact continuation of

the infinite series.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1.2040133779264214046822742474917

The statistical data on the series is interesting on the alpha site:

mean                                    | 3.286

minimum                             | 2           (This is interesting)

first quartile                       | 2.25

median                                  | 3            (This is interesting)

third quartile                     | 4             (This is interesting)

maximum                            | 5             (This is interesting)

harmonic mean                | 2.958     (This is interesting)

geometric mean               | 3.12

root mean square           | 3.443

and…

sample standard deviation          | 1.113

sample variance                               | 1.238

interquartile range                          | 1.75

sample range                                      | 3

coefficient of variation                   | 0.3386

relative standard deviation         | 0.3386

population std. deviation             | 1.03

population variance                        | 1.061

mean deviation                                 | 0.898

median deviation                             | 1

quartile deviation                            | 0.875

standard error of the mean         | 0.4206

coef. of quartile variation            | 28 (This is interesting)

and a few more… (all very interesting, but require more time to investigate, esp. the pearsons number)

skewness                                                                 | 0.192

kurtosis                                                                    | 1.857

quartile skewness                                                | 0.1429

momental skewness                                            | 0.07143

Pearson’s second moment of skewness      | 0.7703

quartile skewness                                                | 0.1429

excess kurtosis                                                     | -1.143

This is the big wow of the statistical analysis for this series:

The confidence intervals of mean:

90% | 2.594 to 3.9775

95% | 2.4614 to 4.11

99% | 2.2024 to 4.369

Here is the link to the alpha site for just the series….

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5+2+3+4+2+3+4

Further research:

Transcendental Number Theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champernowne_constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitin’s_constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schanuel’s_conjecture

Primes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_prime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_prime

Transcendental Primes

http://jlms.oxfordjournals.org/content/s1-39/1/405.extract

History of the number Zero

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number)

I’m done with this….  Send your comments…  If I have time I’ll use Audociacy to generate teh harmonic frequency I pointed out as ineresting.

@ProtoBytes


After two years of research in the latest and greatest technologies from Microsoft, AMD, and Nvidia.  I wrote some abstracts about theories and other ideas floating around that seemed to be good business ideas, however I had no method of accomplishing any of my goals, so I did the humanitarian things to do….  I gave my ideas away for free.
Occasionally I would get discouraged at seeing a large corporation develop my idea in a matter of weeks and have it on shelves fro people to purchase.  Most of the time this worked out to my advantage, it might have taken me 6 Mo. to complete an idea, now I have a fresh copy written by professionals and I can move on to the next stages of my required technological requirements to indeed create something of my own design.
After kicking around a few ideas, and getting kicked around by the major stake holder in the industry warning me to back off their cloud, I realized that my really good ideas the scientific ones, had never made their way into the market.  Yet, I was periodically bombarded with publications written by scientific journalist informing me that my new technological theory on XYZ quantum mechanics is a new scientific breakthrough.  Okay again no big deal, it take quite a bit of money to fund the research required to validate some of my theories, I win again
I will admin it, the only one that hurt my feelings was the scientific theoretical essay I wrote for IEEE to get my associates membership and industry acknowledgement that I have the skills required by all bachelor level trained engineers.  The only reason I got my feelings hurt was because my professor in college informed me it would never work, and this panel of PHD’s accepted the theory was a legitimate method of devising the first ever optical transistor device.  I even received a nice plaque and a solid gold IEEE tie tack to wear on job interviews, as if any of my interviewers knew of the organization, or the significance of the gold pin which is selectively given to individuals, actually it’s only given to the highest members at the fellowship level.  Something I didn’t know at the time.  Well, that paper made it’s way into a laboratory of two European scientists whom made a slight modification to my Brewster’s pezio-electric modulation dielectric mounting withing a simple sub-micron waveguide.  They didn’t even take the time to create their own silicone sub-straight model which I included with the paper, as to how the it could be successfully constructed with todays technology and industry tooling.  Their modification seriously degraded the effectiveness of the device.  This was probably intentional, to save the work on a got to market device for internal study.  What did they do you may be asking, they simply modified the Brewster angle so that a thermal dielectric Silicon Dioxide Layer having a current applied generated enough heat to change the size of the band gap in the dielectric and modulate the light traveling through the wave guide.  Bad idea unless you want to keep it super cold so that the ‘Z’ or quiesce of the whole integrated deice does not suffer thermal breakdown, which it would.  But but some stroke of success on their part, it was enough to win them a Nobel Prize for inventing the first optical transistor.  Perhaps I would feel better if I still had the fancy little tie tack and someone actually believes any of the stories I tell about how my small achievements and observations in science have changed the world.  Over the years I have learned to document my research on public internet sites and the date of actual disclosure can be shown, but how many people I deal with on a day to day basis even understand the foreign language I’m describing to them or even care?  They are far and few.  I suppose pride is a big factor which has no place in running a corporation, perhaps lesson #1.
Todays current task for my corporation is to build relationships with vendors and acquire a small product line that I can eventually start to integrate some of these new quantum computing devices I have been designing since 1995.
I currently have two devices one specialized for computing FFT’s faster then any known technology on earth can; recently validated by Israeli Scientists in Tel Aviv, and published in September Photonic’s Spectra.  Computes A Fast Fourier Transform so fast that it would be impossible to overload it with computations.  It could have other applications, but that is w

”]Fast Fourier transform(FFT) butterfly dataflow...

hat the original design was intended to be used for, I theorize it could be use to perform any type of advanced mathematical computation, FFT’s were just the easiest to implement in a show and tell paper.  It operates more like a digital Signal Processor which is programmable to perform specific tasks highly efficiently.  I have not completed the research on exactly how fast it can be reprogrammed and what it’s limitations are, but this is the first true Quantum Device Computing I have created, it is loosely based on my main research effort that has undergone countless generations of design.  It’s started out as a deice implementing the waveguide transistor technology, as my knowledge and technology advanced I found realized in 2007 that the waveguide approach was not the best and looked for a better solution.

Well this has been a bunch of rambling on about much ego centric stuff about myself.  To tell you something on a more personal and truthful level about myself.  I have a strange talent for understanding this field of emerging technology, however if you follow the link to the above image and read the description and code listing for the application I have to confess I do not have the background to really and honestly tell you that I understand all the details of this FFT algorithm.  All I can honestly say is that I have a different unique understanding of the core science, I can write my own mathematical proof in terms of Postulates and Axioms to derive the proper math and then transform it to code or a technology, I just do it and know it like a second language.  I suppose that is what happens when you meditate upon something fro years in hopes of find solutions to all the unanswered questions.

The other generation is more like traditional computers, and the most recent revision is what I loosely term as a holographic multiple wave THz optical computing device.  It’s about 78% complete in theory.  Works just like a regular computer chip, except the process of fabrication involves new methods of imprinting a holographic coating on a pure sapphire substrate, it also involves some but very little electronic components, and like the FFT package, is a multi-sandwich layered combo of silicon and optical components.  Next blog I will post the original April 10th 2010 posting about the FFT optical device and if I get some time, I will provide a diagram…

So I have answered some of my own unanswered questions by completing this exerciser, for now the corporation has limited potential and should attempt to explore other avenues of accumulating assets and set aside a fund for R&D later down the road.  Currently that plan is limited to building and selling high performance workstations with a goal of creating a Nvidia Personal Super Computer line in the near future.  Sales is not an ability I have naturally, so I should do some market research and read about how to sell high priced items in a sluggish market.  Then there is the flip side of the coin where I go back to work building enterprise systems for corporations to run their business.  At this point I’m a day late and a few dollars short…

Next feature will include the lengthy process of for filling your partnerships requirements of the new corporations, experimental sales strategies to raise capital to pay the bills, and enjoying life under the weight of all the unknowns lurking in the darkness…

Oh yeah I crisen today as binary day of the year: 10.10.10 = 42 = 6×7

(see Hitch hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for more details)

=8)

-Proto-Bytes


Listen to this song when you think of me….
 

A while back I came upon ‘a beautiful woman from a far’ she took me for a ride in her car to my home where all the homeless roam.  On that day she heard a message from God and led me back to her pad.  There I lived for a while, until a day I became defiled.  I then went to live where the drunks go when they have no where else to go and sobered up.  Soon I found my life restored and gainfully employed.  I went back to my lady friend of 28 years greater experienced then I, and told her I would like her to come to my new pad, and return the help she gave me that day the VA made me so mad.  She was something, and a great lover too…  But the years between us she could not separate the two.  One day a furry black cat announced it’s self with an act that followed our same design and made our pad it’s new home.  Nanina name her Ellsinore Rigby, after this song, and there after they I found them both gone and alone and ruined again like the words of this song…
The man who designed all that which I have said, must have some really wonderful ideas in his head.  Some days I wonder why both times I found myself DOA, he thought it was my duty to continue on my lonely path.  I am still discovering the hidden world with in this one, but I think it would have been much kinder just to keep me and show me what I failed to see, and let me have the peace I was always looking for to set me free.  But all I returned with was a memory of a place that glittered like gold snow flakes whirling around a thing I can not describe, but I got the feeling that the place was a special place where your life experience is not measured by the value of gold, but the honesty of your words and deeds, and the truth which you were able to discover here where we call each other brothers….
It’s a special song for me, I thought to share it with you because you are a true friend indeed, one that will succeed this reality and follow me into all my other destinations along my lonely path of self discovery and enlightenment.  Not all people will absolutely agree on everything in this world is easy to see that that knowledge will never set us free, but confrontation is a powerful tool which has been like a big brother to all who have ever learned how to resolved indifference and find acceptance in a world that we are not designed to experience things naturally in such a way.  The world and heavens may be perfect, but I will never let myself believe that I am, I am separated from this world by my ability to choose, and my choices may seem infinite, but the ones which have virtue and glitter like those golden flakes I saw at my own wake, they are few and hard to discern, and I have learned we don’t all find that every snow flake looks the same as the next, even if it is the same golden flake it’s no mistake we were designed to find them unique and special to our selves, and sharing them with others can at times cause conflict and disagreement, but I have understanding that I am separate and as unique as the world I can only perceive and attempt to understand.  It’s hard enough when most of it has been twisted up in the exceptions and misunderstandings of man.
I am sorry if I did or said something that you can’t agree with, perhaps another day and a nice cup of coffee’ we can find a common ground and learn from our disappointments in one another for not seeing the glittering thing the in the same light, on the same day.
Yours Truly,
Alex