The Best of Proto-Bytes Bits-n-Bytes, A Non-All-Inclusive Scientific Research Information and Idea Exchange

Archive for the ‘Personal lessons learned while constructing a private corporation.’ Category

I may never know how dumb I really am…


I prove that nothing and something are complete mistakes in an equation…Honestly randome mistakes…I randomly made it all up, but math has it’s own way of working and teaching me I’m still dumb…This is a silly, philisophical and mathematical logical paradox, hopefully it will replace the old cat in a box…teaching of the past…Creapy weird stories, should frighten childern like that! 

Or cats!

The whole ‘Zero’ problem in math is intellectually boggling to my simple mind, but oddly enough I can spontaneously mumbo-jumbo an equation that equals zero… For all the good in the world that will do me:

frac(2/frac(4/Frac(8(1/(55555549871^16)mod 16)mod 8)mod 4)mod 2)) = 0

site: http://www.wolframalpha.com/

Personal:

Seems beyond my understanding to comprehend, and really makes me think I’m not alone in the universe…  In a philosophical metaphor I once heard… ‘I have come to earth with nothing, and I leave with nothing’  So someone said…

Biblical: 1 Timothy 6:7,  [http://bible.cc/1_timothy/6-7.htm]

Alphabetical: and anything brought can cannot either For have into it nothing of out so take the we world

                  Job 1:21, [http://bible.cc/job/1-21.htm]

Alphabetical: and away be Blessed came depart from gave has He I LORD may mother’s my Naked name of praised return said shall taken The there will womb 

            
Song: U2: Stuck In A Moment [http://www.threechordsandthetruth.net/u2lyrics/atyclb.htm]

Stuck In A Moment

I’m not afraid of anything in this world
There’s nothing you can throw at me that I haven’t already heard
I’m just trying to find a decent melody
A song that I can sing in my own company

I will not forsake the colours that you bring
The nights you filled with fireworks – they left you with nothing
I am still enchanted by the light you brought to me
I listen through your ears – through your eyes I can see

I was unconscious, half asleep
The water is warm till you discover how deep
I wasn’t jumping – for me it was a fall
It’s a long way down to nothing at all

Quran: 5. From Allah, verily nothing is hidden on earth or in the heavens. [http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/quran/3.htm]

Personaly, I have no refrence to inperpate this line…however, it does seem to parallel Job

Things I find odd about the whole ‘Zero Conspiracy‘:

How can it be proven even if it’s not divisable…

Anthing indefinatly multliplied to it is automatically converted to a valueless number…Zero

Number Theroy Books I have read a little bit of indicate it has no inductive proof…I’m no number theroist, but axioums and postulates could be applied, I have no idea how to prove that they would result in a proof… Taking a ‘huge and random’ number like: (55555549871^16) has 10×10^203 digits to start with, then taking the inverse (very small number 10×10^-173 digits, but an exact fractional quanity: 1/(55555549871^16)Then Factorialy expanding it to a huge number:

(Note: Dyslexia; sigh, this should have been fact not frac)

frac(2/frac(4/Frac(8(1/(55555549871^16))))) = 0

fact(2/fact(4/Fact(8(1/(55555549871^16))))) = …Endless series…as far as it looks.  I have no method to prove that, just an observation.

ParadoxicallyStarts with zero, and appreas to aproach zreo: [Series Form]

and

((((1/(55555549871^16)mod 16)mod 8)mod 4)mod 2) = 1/(55555549871^16)

 So once corrected, the formula actual is nearly equal to 1:

[Full Solution as I tried to wite it; but mixed up frac and fact, What’s the moral of this story?]

‘A man can find noting but himself to correct, when not looking for any answers that have any meaning…’ ~ That is what I got from itOther then absurdly confused.  And I really tried hard to make a confusing equation that would equal something meaningful.  Even huge things factor out in the wash…Yup, any number you put in that happy box, will equal nearly 1…

Silly Hua?  Mathmatics humor galore…But while it’s in the box, it’s anything but 1. 

Would make shrodinger laugh I assume…Or maybe his cat would…But I doubt the cat would be laughing…see it’s allways = 1 (True, the cat is not alive)  Always hated that equation, just had to show why it’s stupid to even think about…Save a few barin cells, and learn scientific methods not statistical…Sounds good enough for Mikie, He will eat anything…I’v been Mikie all my life…It has never gotten old, but I am… Thanks for entertaining the thought…Have fun with my Box, it’s not a rubex cube…Could never work one of those either.

It’s a forget me not box…Where everything put in is equaly forgoten about after close analysis…Life is not as simple.

There is not a single understanding I have ever attempted to understand which has any place for the existence of ‘Nothing’…  However fundamental math weighs the checks and balances, and I seem to survive on nearly nothing as far as math could describe: ‘Survial and Exsistance’

Even years of taoist meditation and clearing of thoughts that appear to cause more consequences then undesirable virtues has not helped me understand how to be a perfect ‘Zero’…

Seems my mind spends more time in asserting that it exists, even know the proof of existence or anything based on such absolutes, is out of scope for me to understand….However, it’s easier said then done…. You can take that from an absolute silly dumb person…Mostly anyhow.  And yes I’m speaking for myself, not anyone else…  No harsh flames intended…Seems like being internet friendly becomes harder and harder as days get longer and longer.

Peace out Zero Heroes!

<8)

Early history for the number Zero:
 
By the middle of the 2nd millennium BC, the Babylonian mathematics had a sophisticated sexagesimal positional numeral system. The lack of a positional value (or zero) was indicated by a space between sexagesimal numerals. By 300 BC, a punctuation symbol (two slanted wedges) was co-opted as a placeholder in the same Babylonian system. In a tablet unearthed at Kish (dating from about 700 BC), the scribe Bêl-bân-aplu wrote his zeros with three hooks, rather than two slanted wedges.[9]

Site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number)

Advertisements

I Quit! The world and it’s people all have their reasons.


The Microsoft sign at the entrance of the Germ...

Image via Wikipedia

This is my reply to my long time industry partner Micrsoft black balling me from the BizSpak Partnership Program.  I post this only to allow everyone to be notified that I have resigned to being anything meaningful in life.  And will perhaps find other interests or hobbies like building churches with glue and match sticks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear BizSpark Team,

I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding here.  I started my Spark less then a year and a half ago, and have been head deep into research and development of pioneering the future path of software development and to first create a portal to distribute this technology to the public for consumption.  I am an Associate IEEE Voting Member and the massive amount of research I have performed in the area of massively parallel programming for SIMD and multi-core CPU architecture of today, and my college training and life goal to provide the computer science industry with optical computing solutions.  I honestly do not understand why you have arrived at this conclusion.

Moore’s and Amdahl’s Laws as we know them will soon fail us completely.  It should be no secret to you.  I have actually has several Spark ideas, my most recent was to create a GPU supercomputing Cloud cluster environment for scientists and medical professionals to access and run code on.  Unfortunately three days after I made my small press announcement and updated my Spark profile with the new goals of my company, both your corporation and Hoppie Cloud made industry announcements that they were going to provide this service to the public.  I can’t not compete with you Microsoft.  We have shared many years and many ideas, I have actually had conversations with Scott Guthrie about my ideas of a rapid proto typing software application which was ironically developed with in a two week period and included in Blend 4 as the product Sketch Flow.  I tried my hand at being an ISV and created a B2B brokering system that does exactly what your product one of your enterprise solutions performs.

I have enjoyed seeing you complete my ideas, even in 2001 I wrote a XML based markup language based upon reflections to generate a UI using the Java programming language, you also have a similar product now; XAML.  I am not trying to accuse you of stealing my ideas, I share them freely, and have even helped a team win a Nobel Prize in life.

Today, I have finally formed a real Corporation and filed all the proper paperwork, and I believe I have found my foot hold where no one can compete with my products and services.  To be honest with you My BizSpark Teammate’s who are looking critically upon me at this time.  Every great Idea I have ever pioneered has been adopted and manufactured by large corporations.  My specialty is Quantum Mechanics in the specific area of designing the next generation of optical computer chips.

To this date, if you visited my site, you will see a blanket statement explaining that something is coming.  I am an expert 3.5 .NET programmer, and the addition of DX11 and .NET 4.0 added many items I had to spend many hours of research with to discover what works the same, and what has been introduced that causes undesirable side effects.  I am so much into research of your technology, that if you do a Google search for my name “Alex Wykel” it will point to a #1 hit on Channel 9, where I demonstrated a new technology for performing extremely fast commutations using no mathematics at all, it’s a simple visualizations and it was entered to help Dr. Berkman achieve his goal of merging ; a new concept to me, Monads using a coordinate system.

This email you have sent me has seriously upset me to the extreme, after spending my last 8 years completely devoted to promoting and delivering corporations with the cutting edge solutions you bring to the market.  They come to me because I am known in the industry by my peers as a person whom explores and tests the latest technologies, and becoming an expert on the subjects rather quickly.  Most of my clients employ men to rapidly use rapid application prototyping to build the cutting edge systems that will scale and leverage the technology which is on your radar screen.

I have not once had a bit of contempt for Microsoft, and I have only been a valuable asset in offering your large body of industry consumers the latest solutions, and I explore what you your next plan is and place much thought into where the technology is going.  I build systems that are frameworks designed to scale to meet your next step in technological delivery.

I recently I have been a bit out of character, making odd comments about the break down in technology, and offering a helping hand where ever possible, and I always have your inspiration and best interest in mind.  That is saying a lot for a industry expert, who was formally trained by the developers of the Java programming language, and left that line of work because I was the told you had to offer and C# was a more elegant solution.

If you are going to black ball me, have the humanity and decency to give me a justified reason for this turn of events in our relationship.

Today marked the day I officially started my beta acceptance testing of IE9.  Last night marked the day I officially started to create more than just a blanket ‘under construction’ front page.  Truth be known I once calculate the number if multimillion dollar ideas I have in a 6 mo. period alone to be estimated to take well over 6000 man years to complete, so I give man away to those I believe might have a better chance and interest in making them a reality.

My new BizSpark has three primary goals:  Provide a necessary portal to scientist in my field of optical commuting to share and freely exchange and gather ideas and data, with a gold of helping all individuals network these sparse ideas and discover a solution to optical computing.  There is a great demand for such a portal, I just happened to read about it in today’s issue of Photonics Spectra.  I will also showcase an Computer Science R&D area where both show problem problems in the industry is heading, and much like your Microsoft Research site offer downloads of sample code for scientists and engineers to experiment with.  I have a goal to invent a new computer language specifically designed for quantum computing devices, my thoughts are that the area of Turing Machines is coming to an end, and that is part of the problem.  I have not been with just twiddling my thumbs, and acting like a know it all.  Solved a problem some of you best MVP’s said was impossible, the solution to me was instantly realized, and I created a prototype, and wrote an article about it on the web site ‘The Code Project’  See my profile: Proto-Bytes@thecodeproject.com.  I had another idea to completely rewrite my on JIT compiler and offload everything to Nvidia’s PSX instruction set.  For me it’s a big matter of where time is better spent.  Currently the creation of a private corporation and making industry partnerships to build infrastructure and supercomputing solutions for your HPC platform has made a significant impact on my ability to sit and write code.  I’m the CTO of my corporation: AW Proto Code, Inc.  I am looking for a CTO to run the show and help us make first flight.  However within the next few weeks, I will have not just a simple front page completely designed suing Silverlight 4, but I will be hosting video series about the tools provided by you and others, and the logical steps I had to make to create a new workaround.  Last night I spent the entire night refactoring MEF 2 Preview because it was not strongly signed, and had no application GUID, two things required if I am to build it and demo it, so I can legally say I didn’t place any malicious code in it.  I was doing it in an attempt to showcase your newest technology before anyone else started working with it.  That is what I do, that is what my spark does.

The choice is up to you, if I have no access to your software anymore.  I am going to end my career as a software developer and never mention or promote a single computer or software product for as short as my life might last.  So if you words are to be the last and final here and now, they will be a hallow echo in my mind of all the people and things I loved in life eventually turning against me.

I would like you to know I served in the United Armed Forces, to protect the constitution and it came at a price, and left me with an illness that is slowly killing me every day, mentally and physically.  And it’s all classified, and never happened, and they are not doing anything to help me for cleaning up an antrathx contaminated zone on our base.  It never happened.  I was not even told that was what I was doing.  So I have already paid the ultimate price for freedom, but everyday someone, something takes it away from me.  I’m a scientist and IEEE engineer, I live my life by a higher code of ethics than ordinary people believe is reasonable.  Why?  Because I held the highest clearance in the US Government which required me to make a life commitment to obey the oath of enlistment, and that oath ended with the “words until the day I die.”

So whatever you reason for discriminating against me, I’m sure you have layers that will agree with the highest courts in the land I gave my life to assure our children are free and safe from the ugly things they teach all about, that no one wants to know.

I am man who is incapable of lying, and I serve a higher purpose then my own selfish interests.  I serve humanity.  I am truly sorry you have chosen to revoke my participation in your program.  This effectively ends my career and interest in Computer Science.  I suppose I will call my attorney and tell him to dissolve my corporation and start writing letters to all the industry partners I have tried hard to prove I have valuable information they can make use of.  You have made this the saddest day of my professional life.  Thank you for your cold worlds and meaningless rejection letter.  No one likes a ProtoByte anyhow, we are virtual and don’t matter in the bigger picture of things.

This was unexpected.  But what should I expect when I have a history of everyone turning tier back on me, no matter how much I give back to the balance of life.

No reply is required.  I will accept your denial in this program, you have so willing already give me, and I have participated in for over a year and a half.  I still meet the required criteria, but you have discriminated based on some unknown reason.  I don’t want explication really.  This email is enough to show me that your have no intentions of allowing me to succeed in my life’s goals.

This will be publicly posted on my World Press Blog for everyone to reference as to the nature and reason why I have made the ultimate decision to end the last thing in life that had any significant meaning for me.  Sue me if you like it’s all true, and I have not a penny to my name!  But I have made so many other millions, including your company.

To all those who are interested in my corporate portfolio my

DUNNS# is: 02-133-1437, and I was an internet start up corporation EIN:27-3563061.

[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]

I will withdraw my corporation from federal listing and make any necessary apologies for be myself!  This will no doubt take time, I have spent two years making partnerships to make my BizSpark work.  Can’t have faith in anyone but yourself these days, and the message I get is that I shouldn’t even have faith in my own self.  Suicide is not the answer, though it seems I have committed social suicide in some way to get all this banter from leaders of industry discriminating against me.  If death would solve the problem, it would be a simple choice to make.  but I live to be a man who gives back to life, not a selfish on that takes my takent to the grave.  And it’s not true, you don’t find yourself once you loose everything, you find the truth about everyone else and what reality is all about, and how you have no meaning, no matter what you think or give to it, living death is what you take back.  Don;t feel sorry for me, I am responsible for my own path.  Unfortunately, it is just a path I walk alone in the quite stillness of everlasting darkness, and shadows of nothing left to fill my creativity with.

[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]

All that has ended on this night of Thursday October, 21, 2010, because I have lost the will to pour my heart and soul out upon the world and enrich peoples lives, and have everyone take everything that I hold dear to me and tell me I have no right or am not worthy of having such a cherished part of my life that I can find simple fading joys in.

Looks like I will become a couch potato!  I will never become a hater, but I will never love or find joy again either.  Maybe after a few years of that, I’ll look back and think to myself how did I become Mr. Potato Head in the first place?  And maybe I’ll be inspired to write a song or stupid blog about it all.

My Unfortunate Apologies for not meeting your requirements for membership,

Ernest Lack of regard for myself,

Alexander L. Wykel (@ProtoBytes)

Proto-bytes@awprotocode.com

‘Einstein was wrong when he stated WWVI would be fought with sticks and stones, it is being fought with 1’s and 0’, and soon qubits and quiotons”

~Final Pathetic Words from a lonely ancestor of the founders of this nation, John Alden, and Pricilla Ann Mullen, their founding influence  is no more.

From: bzssvc@microsoft.com [mailto:bzssvc@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 7:54 PM
To: Proto-Bytes@awprotocode.com
Subject: Microsoft BizSpark

Microsoft BizSpark

Dear Alexander Wykel (AW Software Works),

Thank you for your interest in the BizSpark™ Program.

From the information you provided, it does not appear that you meet all the eligibility requirements at this time. To enter the program, your startup must be:

  • Actively engaged in development of a software-based product or online service that will form a core piece of its current or intended business,
  • Privately held,
  • In business for less than 3 years, and
  • Less than US $1 million in annual revenue

(For specific information about the eligibility requirements, please refer to the Startup Program Guide.)

If you have additional questions about the program, or if you would like to provide us with additional information about your startup or product that shows you meet the eligibility requirements, please email us. We’ll be happy to help.

In addition to BizSpark, there are a wide range of programs and resources Microsoft has to help your business succeed, including:

  • WebsiteSpark – Visibility, support and software for professional Web Developers and Designers. Receive Windows Web Server and SQL Server Web Edition at no cost to host new websites.
  • Microsoft Action Pack Development and Design Membership gives you access to the latest Microsoft software, key development tools, deep technical support and business development resources to help accelerate your product development and get your application to market faster.
  • DreamSpark Enables students to download Microsoft platform resources, and developer and design tools at no charge.
  • Free and Trial Version Software A wide range of free and trial versions of Microsoft’s leading software to help develop innovative solutions.

(This message comes from an unmonitored alias. Please do not reply directly.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I missed the part where they said don’t reply directly, but fortunatly I copied ScottGu; the only person at MS who listens to me, on the trash mail.  No I didn’t review their privacy statement.  I hope the come and sue me to death for my last jar of peanut-butter!

The BizSpark Team

Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052

©2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Microsoft is either a registered trademark or trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.

Review our Privacy Statement

I leave you with this to remember me by:

Todays fun with numerical analysis and the number 23 and more….


 Today I received a text mesage from a friend telling me they were celibrating thier 23rd anaversary of a special occasion.  So I decided to give a polite reply with some numerical analysis of 23.  I found a connection to the Fabannici Series and the Golden Ratio.  I thought how sweet, 23 = natural beauty for my friend on this special day.

While doing the research on the internet of the numbers I was crunching, I also found the following numerical series someone submitted and the site ask.com replied it was a phone number.  So I did my own analysis of it and here is what I was able to unravel.  My analysis is a little off of what some mathamiticians might seem is real inductive numerical analysis, however, the same method has always given me outstandingly high scores on my IQ tests so there must be something to the method of my maddness.

Any way I posted an entry on Face Book about my little morning exersize, which now has driven me into the after noon because ask deleted my detailed essay on the topic, and others wanted to see it and I send a tweet about it to see if anyone would like to reviwe my methods and have any comment.  Well, it’s taken me another 2 and 1/2 hours of recaculation and going even further to create this blog and do even more detailed research.  Hope you have fun reading the numerical methoda and conclusions I jump to…  They seem to entertain me…

Base Pairs: [5 2] [3 4] [2 3] [4]

[First order base pairs calculation on base pairs]

5-2=3

3-4=1 [1st Group 1: pairs {3,1}]

—–

[Second order base pairs  calculation on base pairs]

1-3=2 [Continue using the Group 1 base pair result]

3-4=1 [1st Group 2: pairs {2,1}]

—–

[Third order base pairs result all base pairs]

2-1=1 [1st Result Group: series terminator {1}]

[now reverse the process and revers the induction to add the First order Reslt Pairs]

3+1=4

2+1=3 [2nd Group: pairs {4,3}]

—–

[Again reverse the induction now subtract]

4-3=1 [2nd Result Group: {1}]

[Finally last subtraction of 1st result and 2nd result group {1,1}]

1-1=0 [Final Result: Absolute terminator {0}]

This is an interesting series.  The first group result yields mankind’s first logical number assignment 1 in the

counting system.  The second result group also yields 1 as the result, perhaps a mathematical logical expression

of trying to identify that if we both have ‘1’ and give it to a third who will have ‘2’ and we are both left with ‘0’

The addition of zero was never really introduced into mankind’s number system until this kind of calculation was necessary

mostly for book keeping, in small trade it was common knowledge that if you give it all away you walk away with nothing

but that is not how the barter system worked, which is what mankind used to assure that trade was fair and there was

never an deficiency of free trade.  So when these type of issues arose someone usually got hit over the head with a

blunt object to settle the dispute, and take what was rightfully theirs.  Okay, that was my analysis on inductive

addition and subtracting to achieve a derived absolute number result.  The same method could derive a formula that

would produce an endless series of number that conform to the it’s all equal to zero in the end, by correctly extending

the series.

The second analysis I performed was to see what the number add to and subtracted to:

23  [additive, which is a prime number (interesting)]

-13 [subtractive, also a prime number (equally interesting)]

in primes there is a great interest in finding what are called trans dental prime numbers, in which

the whole manifold of transcendental sets belonging to the absolute transcendental manifold is nearly infinite,

However it is believed that prime transcendental number belong to a set of number with an exact number of

possible transcenant primes.  So I looked for one:

23/13 = 1.7692307692307692307692307692308 [rational because it has real numbers which are divided]

then the inverse:

13/23 = 0.56521739130434782608695652173913

Correction: I used an on line Hugh number calculator to double check the math…  The number is not irrational at all

Okay nothing seemed too interesting here, so I subtracted:

0.56521739130434782608695652173913 – 1.7692307692307692307692307692308 =

-1.2040133779264214046822742474917 [this is irrational, perhaps a transcendental number also, not going to poof that]

 and the positive if the sine is reversed:

1.2040133779264214046822742474917

Actually my x64 bit computer did not fully caculate the number so I thought it was irrational, however it is not:

1.204013377926421404682274247491638795986622073578595317725752508361204013377926421404682274247491

Well no search engine comes up with any answers on the above number,

however The Wolframalpha DB has some really close approximations for this number.

The best are:

[This is the exact ratio for the huge number calculation above]

360/299

and the linear continued fraction in form {1, 4, 1, 9, 6} “suppose this yields an exact continuation of

the infinite series.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1.2040133779264214046822742474917

The statistical data on the series is interesting on the alpha site:

mean                                    | 3.286

minimum                             | 2           (This is interesting)

first quartile                       | 2.25

median                                  | 3            (This is interesting)

third quartile                     | 4             (This is interesting)

maximum                            | 5             (This is interesting)

harmonic mean                | 2.958     (This is interesting)

geometric mean               | 3.12

root mean square           | 3.443

and…

sample standard deviation          | 1.113

sample variance                               | 1.238

interquartile range                          | 1.75

sample range                                      | 3

coefficient of variation                   | 0.3386

relative standard deviation         | 0.3386

population std. deviation             | 1.03

population variance                        | 1.061

mean deviation                                 | 0.898

median deviation                             | 1

quartile deviation                            | 0.875

standard error of the mean         | 0.4206

coef. of quartile variation            | 28 (This is interesting)

and a few more… (all very interesting, but require more time to investigate, esp. the pearsons number)

skewness                                                                 | 0.192

kurtosis                                                                    | 1.857

quartile skewness                                                | 0.1429

momental skewness                                            | 0.07143

Pearson’s second moment of skewness      | 0.7703

quartile skewness                                                | 0.1429

excess kurtosis                                                     | -1.143

This is the big wow of the statistical analysis for this series:

The confidence intervals of mean:

90% | 2.594 to 3.9775

95% | 2.4614 to 4.11

99% | 2.2024 to 4.369

Here is the link to the alpha site for just the series….

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5+2+3+4+2+3+4

Further research:

Transcendental Number Theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champernowne_constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitin’s_constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schanuel’s_conjecture

Primes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_prime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid_number

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_prime

Transcendental Primes

http://jlms.oxfordjournals.org/content/s1-39/1/405.extract

History of the number Zero

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number)

I’m done with this….  Send your comments…  If I have time I’ll use Audociacy to generate teh harmonic frequency I pointed out as ineresting.

@ProtoBytes

AW Proto Code, Inc. – Growing Pains Reveled


After two years of research in the latest and greatest technologies from Microsoft, AMD, and Nvidia.  I wrote some abstracts about theories and other ideas floating around that seemed to be good business ideas, however I had no method of accomplishing any of my goals, so I did the humanitarian things to do….  I gave my ideas away for free.
Occasionally I would get discouraged at seeing a large corporation develop my idea in a matter of weeks and have it on shelves fro people to purchase.  Most of the time this worked out to my advantage, it might have taken me 6 Mo. to complete an idea, now I have a fresh copy written by professionals and I can move on to the next stages of my required technological requirements to indeed create something of my own design.
After kicking around a few ideas, and getting kicked around by the major stake holder in the industry warning me to back off their cloud, I realized that my really good ideas the scientific ones, had never made their way into the market.  Yet, I was periodically bombarded with publications written by scientific journalist informing me that my new technological theory on XYZ quantum mechanics is a new scientific breakthrough.  Okay again no big deal, it take quite a bit of money to fund the research required to validate some of my theories, I win again
I will admin it, the only one that hurt my feelings was the scientific theoretical essay I wrote for IEEE to get my associates membership and industry acknowledgement that I have the skills required by all bachelor level trained engineers.  The only reason I got my feelings hurt was because my professor in college informed me it would never work, and this panel of PHD’s accepted the theory was a legitimate method of devising the first ever optical transistor device.  I even received a nice plaque and a solid gold IEEE tie tack to wear on job interviews, as if any of my interviewers knew of the organization, or the significance of the gold pin which is selectively given to individuals, actually it’s only given to the highest members at the fellowship level.  Something I didn’t know at the time.  Well, that paper made it’s way into a laboratory of two European scientists whom made a slight modification to my Brewster’s pezio-electric modulation dielectric mounting withing a simple sub-micron waveguide.  They didn’t even take the time to create their own silicone sub-straight model which I included with the paper, as to how the it could be successfully constructed with todays technology and industry tooling.  Their modification seriously degraded the effectiveness of the device.  This was probably intentional, to save the work on a got to market device for internal study.  What did they do you may be asking, they simply modified the Brewster angle so that a thermal dielectric Silicon Dioxide Layer having a current applied generated enough heat to change the size of the band gap in the dielectric and modulate the light traveling through the wave guide.  Bad idea unless you want to keep it super cold so that the ‘Z’ or quiesce of the whole integrated deice does not suffer thermal breakdown, which it would.  But but some stroke of success on their part, it was enough to win them a Nobel Prize for inventing the first optical transistor.  Perhaps I would feel better if I still had the fancy little tie tack and someone actually believes any of the stories I tell about how my small achievements and observations in science have changed the world.  Over the years I have learned to document my research on public internet sites and the date of actual disclosure can be shown, but how many people I deal with on a day to day basis even understand the foreign language I’m describing to them or even care?  They are far and few.  I suppose pride is a big factor which has no place in running a corporation, perhaps lesson #1.
Todays current task for my corporation is to build relationships with vendors and acquire a small product line that I can eventually start to integrate some of these new quantum computing devices I have been designing since 1995.
I currently have two devices one specialized for computing FFT’s faster then any known technology on earth can; recently validated by Israeli Scientists in Tel Aviv, and published in September Photonic’s Spectra.  Computes A Fast Fourier Transform so fast that it would be impossible to overload it with computations.  It could have other applications, but that is w

”]Fast Fourier transform(FFT) butterfly dataflow...

hat the original design was intended to be used for, I theorize it could be use to perform any type of advanced mathematical computation, FFT’s were just the easiest to implement in a show and tell paper.  It operates more like a digital Signal Processor which is programmable to perform specific tasks highly efficiently.  I have not completed the research on exactly how fast it can be reprogrammed and what it’s limitations are, but this is the first true Quantum Device Computing I have created, it is loosely based on my main research effort that has undergone countless generations of design.  It’s started out as a deice implementing the waveguide transistor technology, as my knowledge and technology advanced I found realized in 2007 that the waveguide approach was not the best and looked for a better solution.

Well this has been a bunch of rambling on about much ego centric stuff about myself.  To tell you something on a more personal and truthful level about myself.  I have a strange talent for understanding this field of emerging technology, however if you follow the link to the above image and read the description and code listing for the application I have to confess I do not have the background to really and honestly tell you that I understand all the details of this FFT algorithm.  All I can honestly say is that I have a different unique understanding of the core science, I can write my own mathematical proof in terms of Postulates and Axioms to derive the proper math and then transform it to code or a technology, I just do it and know it like a second language.  I suppose that is what happens when you meditate upon something fro years in hopes of find solutions to all the unanswered questions.

The other generation is more like traditional computers, and the most recent revision is what I loosely term as a holographic multiple wave THz optical computing device.  It’s about 78% complete in theory.  Works just like a regular computer chip, except the process of fabrication involves new methods of imprinting a holographic coating on a pure sapphire substrate, it also involves some but very little electronic components, and like the FFT package, is a multi-sandwich layered combo of silicon and optical components.  Next blog I will post the original April 10th 2010 posting about the FFT optical device and if I get some time, I will provide a diagram…

So I have answered some of my own unanswered questions by completing this exerciser, for now the corporation has limited potential and should attempt to explore other avenues of accumulating assets and set aside a fund for R&D later down the road.  Currently that plan is limited to building and selling high performance workstations with a goal of creating a Nvidia Personal Super Computer line in the near future.  Sales is not an ability I have naturally, so I should do some market research and read about how to sell high priced items in a sluggish market.  Then there is the flip side of the coin where I go back to work building enterprise systems for corporations to run their business.  At this point I’m a day late and a few dollars short…

Next feature will include the lengthy process of for filling your partnerships requirements of the new corporations, experimental sales strategies to raise capital to pay the bills, and enjoying life under the weight of all the unknowns lurking in the darkness…

Oh yeah I crisen today as binary day of the year: 10.10.10 = 42 = 6×7

(see Hitch hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for more details)

=8)

-Proto-Bytes